The independent presidential candidate for the United Front, Hamat NK Bah, and his backers namely Halifa Sallah of PDOIS, Henry Gomez, of GPDP and Sidia Jatta of NADD, have issued a preliminary statement following the declaration of the 2011 Presidential Election results.

The statement reads:
On Friday 25th November 2011, the Independent Electoral Commission declared the final results of the 2011 Presidential Election. The Independent Candidate has 73.060 votes.

A meeting was scheduled after the declarations of the results to review the figures and issue a statement but the meeting had to be delayed because of the late arrival of Honourable Henry Gomez who later explained that he boarded a taxi to come to the meeting only to have the movement of the vehicle blocked by another transport with Gambia Revenue Authority inscribed on the door.

Four persons came to indicate to him that he was under arrest and compelled him to join their vehicle. They refused to reveal their identity. The boss apologized and rationalized that it was a case of mistaken identity.

This incident which took place just before the meeting to determine whether or not to accept the results of the 2011 presidential election is rather instructive. The United Front strongly condemns this threat to the security of the leader of a member party and will approach the Inspector General of Police to provide security to both Hon Bah and Hon Gomez.

The United Front has seen the need for lessons to be drawn from the results of the elections. The existence of the front is a reflection of the absence of the second round of voting which enables all parties to participate in the first round to check their political weight.

The Front therefore strongly recommends for constitutional reform to be instituted to restore the second round of voting in presidential elections.

Another fundamental lesson is that the 11 days allocated by the IEC as campaign period has grossly disadvantaged the opposition parties after being deprived of access to the media for a period of four years prior to the campaign period.

The opposition parties do not have access to state resources. We could not thoroughly cover any constituency and could not mobilize sufficient resources within the limited time frame to conduct a proper campaign.

Secondly, the APRC has been given an edge by the support it receives from the business community and public enterprises to ensure the provision of T-shirts, bill boards and other accessories that serve as campaign materials.

The involvement of APRC mobilisers in community sensitization meetings conducted by public enterprises helps to sustain the grass-roots organizations of the party.

 Suffice it to say that the utilization of the material resources of the state, especially vehicles and the involvement of chiefs, who are heads of district tribunals, Governors and other public servants or members of the security forces do not provide a level ground for holding free and fair elections.

In this light, it is the Candid view of the Independent candidate and members of the United Front that we should propose the holding of a National Conference on the electoral system so that reforms could be initiated to ensure that there is level ground to hold genuine multi party contest and free and fair elections. A final statement will be issued after debriefing the regional coordinators.